ESG Ranking of Russian companies 2020 as of 15.12.2020

ESG Ranking of Russian companies 2020 as of 15.12.2020 

Company

Industry

Sub-industry

ESG Rank

E Rank

S Rank

G Rank

Polymetal Metals&Mining Gold 1 1 2 15
LUKOIL Oil&Gas Integrated Oil & Gas 2 4 11 2
SIBURHolding Chemicals Petrochemicals 3 2 5 10
Russian Railways Transport Passenger Transportation, Ground & Sea 4 12 9 4
MTS Telecom Wireless Telecommunications Services 5 20 6 3
NLMK Metals&Mining Iron & Steel 6 8 3 18
Inter RAO Energy Electric Utilities 7 3 7 20
Rostelecom Telecom Integrated Telecommunications Services 8 18 13 8
Rosatom Energy Nuclear energy 9 10 27 5
SUEK Metals&Mining Coal 10 14 12 16
Sakhalin Energy Oil&Gas Integrated Oil & Gas 11 9 8 33
Gazprom Group Oil&Gas Integrated Oil & Gas 12 5 17 26
Severstal Metals&Mining Iron & Steel 13 26 4 11
Polyus Metals&Mining Gold 14 15 10 24
Rosneft Oil&Gas Integrated Oil & Gas 15 7 19 21
ALROSA Metals&Mining Non-Gold Precious Metals & Minerals 16 16 22 9
Sistema Financials Holdings 17 22 18 13
Aeroflot Transport Airlines 18 28 1 31
FGC UES Energy Electric Utilities (Generation and Transmission) 19 13 37 1
RusHydro Energy Electric Utilities (Generation and Transmission) 20 6 21 30
Rosseti Energy Electric Utilities (Generation and Transmission) 21 11 35 6
Phosagro Chemicals Agricultural Chemicals 22 21 28 14
Rusal Metals&Mining Specialty Mining & Metals 23 17 24 29
X5 Retail Group Retail Food Retailers 24 30 20 22
Petropavlovsk Metals&Mining Gold 25 19 14 36
NOVATEK Oil&Gas Integrated Oil & Gas 26 25 23 25
MMK Metals&Mining Iron & Steel 27 24 30 12
Transneft Oil&Gas Oil & Gas Transportation Services 28 31 36 7
EVRAZ Metals&Mining Iron & Steel 29 32 25 28
Metalloinvest Metals&Mining Iron & Steel 30 23 26 38
TMK Metals&Mining Iron & Steel 31 27 34 32
Nornickel Metals&Mining Specialty Mining & Metals 32 38 16 27
Sberbank Financials Banks 33 39 32 17
OMK Metals&Mining Iron & Steel 34 34 15 40
Unipro Energy Electric Utilities (Generation and Transmission) 35 37 29 19
Gazpromneft Oil&Gas Integrated Oil & Gas 36 33 31 35
Tatneft Oil&Gas Integrated Oil & Gas 37 36 33 23
Magnit Retail Food Retailers 38 35 38 37
Surgutneftegas Oil&Gas Integrated Oil & Gas 39 29 42 43
EuroChem Chemical Agricultural Chemicals 40 40 39 34
TNS Energo Energy Electric Utilities (Services) 41 52 44 39
USC Diversified Industrials Diversified Industrials 42 43 46 41
Yamal LNG Oil&Gas Gas Exploration and Production 43 41 49 45
Yandex Information Technologies Software & Services 44 45 45 44
UAC Diversified Industrials Diversified Industrials 45 49 40 48
RussNeft Oil&Gas Integrated Oil & Gas 46 44 43 46
Mechel Metals&Mining Iron & Steel 47 51 52 42
Slavneft Oil&Gas Integrated Oil & Gas 48 48 51 47
UMMC Metals&Mining Specialty Mining & Metals 49 42 41 52
TAIF-NK Oil&Gas Oil & Gas Production 50 46 48 49
T Plus Energy Electric Utilities 51 47 50 50
IMH Metals&Mining Iron & Steel 52 50 47 53
S7 Airlines Transport Airlines 53 53 53 51

See ESG Ranking of Russian companies as of 11.11.2020

ESG Ranking of Russian companies as of 11.11.2020

ESG Ranking of Russian companies 2020 as of 15.12.2020 

Company Industry Sub-industry ESG Rank E Rank S Rank G Rank
LUKOIL Oil&Gas Integrated Oil & Gas 1 3 10 2
SIBUR Holding Chemicals Petrochemicals 2 1 4 10
Russian Railways Transport Passenger Transportation, Ground & Sea 3 11 8 4
MTS Telecom Wireless Telecommunications Services 4 18 5 3
NLMK Metals&Mining Iron & Steel 5 6 2 16
Inter RAO Energy Electric Utilities 6 2 6 17
Rostelecom Telecom Integrated Telecommunications Services 7 17 12 8
Rosatom Energy Nuclear energy 8 8 23 5
SUEK Metals&Mining Coal 9 13 11 15
Sakhalin Energy Oil&Gas Integrated Oil & Gas 10 7 7 29
Gazprom Oil&Gas Integrated Oil & Gas 11 4 14 22
Severstal Metals&Mining Iron & Steel 12 24 3 11
Polyus Metals&Mining Gold 13 14 9 20
ALROSA Metals&Mining Non-Gold Precious Metals & Minerals 14 15 17 9
Sistema Holdings Holdings 15 20 15 13
Aeroflot Transport Airlines 16 26 1 27
FGC UES Energy Electric Utilities 17 12 30 1
RusHydro Energy Electric Utilities 18 5 16 26
Rosneft Oil&Gas Integrated Oil & Gas 19 9 22 18
Rosseti Energy Electric Utilities 20 10 28 6
Phosagro Chemicals Agricultural Chemicals 21 19 24 14
Rusal Metals&Mining Specialty Mining & Metals 22 16 19 25
NOVATEK Oil&Gas Integrated Oil & Gas 23 23 18 21
MMK Metals&Mining Iron & Steel 24 22 25 12
TransNeft Oil&Gas Oil & Gas Transportation Services 25 28 29 7
EVRAZ Metals&Mining Iron & Steel 26 29 20 24
Metalloinvest Metals&Mining Iron & Steel 27 21 21 31
TMK Metals&Mining Iron & Steel 28 25 27 28
Nornickel Metals&Mining Specialty Mining & Metals 29 31 13 23
Tatneft Oil&Gas Integrated Oil & Gas 30 30 26 19
Surgutneftegas Oil&Gas Integrated Oil & Gas 31 27 34 34
EuroChem Chemical Agricultural Chemicals 32 32 31 30
USC Diversified Industrials Diversified Industrials 33 34 35 32
UAC Diversified Industrials Diversified Industrials 34 36 32 35
Mechel Metals&Mining Iron & Steel 35 37 37 33
UMMC Metals&Mining Specialty Mining & Metals 36 33 33 37
T Plus Energy Electric Utilities 37 35 36 36

See ESG Ranking of Russian companies 2019

ESG Ranking of Russian companies 2019

Company                 

E

S

G

ESG 2019

ESG 2018

Lukoil

6 5 2 1 1

Tatneft

7 2 14 2 4

Gazprom

14 3 8 3 3

Norilsk Nickel

18 4 4 4 10

Rosseti

2 9 10 5 8

Russian Railways

5 6 16 6 6

MMK

13 12 9 7 2

ALROSA, AK

16 8 12 8 5

Rosneft

10 7 18 9 7

NOVATEK

3 14 17 10 9

NLMK Group

15 18 5 11 12

Inter RAO

25 1 7 12 18

SIBUR Holding

11 13 23 13 14

Transneft 

4 11 26 14 15

Aeroflot 

1 20 13 15 11

RUSHYDRO

20 15 15 16 16

UC RUSAL

12 24 3 17 13

EVRAZ 

21 21 1 18 21

SEVERSTAL

19 22 11 19 19

Metalloinvest 

17 19 24 20 17

Surgutneftegaz

9 25 19 21 23

Sakhalin Energy 

8 17 29 22 24

Rosatom 

22 10 27 23 20

Siberian Coal Energy Company (SUEK)

24 16 25 24 22

EuroChem Group

23 26 22 25 25

Mechel

26 28 6 26 26

United Shipbuilding Corporation

25 23 20 27 28

T Plus 

26 29 21 28 27

United Aircraft Corporation

26 27 28 29 29

UMMC

26 29 30 30 30

See ESG Ranking of Russian companies 2018

ESG Ranking of Russian companies 2018

Company                 

E

S

G

ESG

Lukoil

6

1

1

1

MMK

9

3

5

2

Gazprom

11

6

3

3

Tatneft

5

4

9

4

ALROSA, AK

16

9

7

5

Russian Railways

4

11

11

6

Rosneft

10

5

18

7

Rosseti

2

13

15

8

NOVATEK

3

14

14

9

Norilsk Nickel

17

8

17

10

Aeroflot

1

19

12

11

NLMK Group

13

21

6

12

UC RUSAL

23

7

8

13

SIBUR Holding

8

15

23

14

Transneft

14

10

25

15

RUSHYDRO

12

18

20

16

Metalloinvest

18

16

22

17

Inter RAO

25

2

4

18

SEVERSTAL

19

24

10

19

Rosatom

20

12

28

20

EVRAZ

21

20

13

21

Siberian Coal Energy Company (SUEK)

22

17

24

22

Surgutneftegaz

7

26

26

23

Sakhalin Energy

15

30

29

24

EuroChem Group

26

22

16

25

Mechel

27

29

2

26

T Plus

27

23

21

27

United Shipbuilding Corporation

27

25

19

28

United Aircraft Corporation

24

28

27

29

UMMC

27

27

30

30

See Analytics 2019

Over the past year, Russian largest corporates have achieved progress in understanding of ESG reporting and responsible investments principles. They are encouraged by the increasing demand from international investors, regulatory initiatives in Russia and the emergence of ESG competitors from the neighboring countries. It is time for mid-sized and local companies to gain momentum and join the ESG initiative.

By mid-2019, the number of companies adhering to the UN Principles for Responsible Investment had reached almost 2 500 from more than 50 countries. An example of the continued growth of international investors' interest in ESG is the dynamics of investment funds with focus on various ESG indices in their strategies. According to the 1H 2019 results, the volume of assets under their management amounted to USD 4,7 bn, twice as much as in the same period of 2018.

The second group of motivating factors for Russian companies were local regulatory initiatives, including the establishment of a Sustainable Development Sector on the Moscow Stock Exchange. Currently, the process of filling the sector with “green” and “socially responsible” issuers is underway. In the future, after the realization of all the planned initiatives, tax benefits will be available for investments in financial instruments of this sector, which means that the demand for such securities will increase.

Finally, competition for international “responsible” investments in the post-Soviet area is growing. Several countries have recently announced the creation of “green” financial infrastructure. In particular, in Kazakhstan, the International Financial Center “Astana” is preparing to issue the first green bonds, while similar plans are announced in Belarus by state-owned banks.

Maintaining methodological consistency with the previous release of the ranking, we focused only on the largest Russian corporations. However, in the course of preparing the ranking, we revealed a large number of companies outside the TOP-50 of Russian business having detailed ESG- or Sustainable reports and practices. The most vivid illustration is the “RSB HMAO Ltd.”, which was the first issuer of green bonds in Russia. In our view, medium-sized companies can be at least as effective in their ESG practices as large businesses.

The Agency continues to enhance corporate ESG ranking methodology and broaden the scope and universe of this ranking in cooperation with representatives of large and medium-sized businesses committed to sustainable investment. We look forward to your feedback and proposals for further development of the ranking.

See Analytics 2018

RAEX-Europe has published the first ESG ranking of the largest companies of Russia. The results of the ranking were presented by Svetlana Grishankova, Managing director of Rating-Agentur Expert RA GmbH at the conference RAEX-600, which took place in Moscow in 3rdof October 2018.

The Russian companies listed on international stock exchanges are the most widely represented in the TOP-10 ESG ranking. The leader of ESG ranking is oil company “Lukoil”. Also, the companies having highly developed social and corporate governance procedures, as well as modern practices of environmental risks mitigation, joined the leading positions in the ranking: MMK, Gazprom, Tatneft, ALROSA.

The “e-leaders” group (environmental section) was formed not only by the companies from the industries with low environmental impact, such as transport, logistic and electric power transmission, but also from the ecologically “unfriendly” sectors, such as oil, gaz and chemical industries, where the modern technologies help to minimize the negative environmental impact.

The “social” leaders (social section) were mostly presented by the oil- and still industries companies with well-developed human capital and industrial safety development practices.

The companies included to the TOP-10 by the corporate governance efficiency are mostly public companies using the world best-practices of the corporate governance and having highly transparent financial reporting.

Methodology for assigning ESG Ratings to Corporates

 

See Methodology 2018-2019

The original universe of the companies for ESG ranking was formed by the TOP-50 RAEX-600 ranking (by total volume of revenues). We excluded the companies from the industries having a negligible environmental impact, such as retail, financial sector, telecom and holding companies. In addition, we excluded the subsidiaries and affiliates of the international companies, operating in Russia. Finally, only 30 companies were chosen for the assessment within the ESG Ranking.

The ESG ranking of the Russian companies was based on the assessment of the optimal set of selected indicators that show how the company impacts the ecological and social environment, as well as degree of its exposure to the social and governance risks. The following indicators were used:

Environmental (as a ratio to total revenues)

  • Water use (million cubic meters)
  • Waste generated (th. tonnes)
  • Total emissions (th. tonnes)

Social

  • Social expenditure and Human capital investments per one Employee (th. RUB)
  • OHS (Accident frequency rate, number of accidents per 1,000 employees)

Governance:

  • Share of independent board members (% of total Board)
  • % of shares in free float
  • Transparency in corporate reporting (according to Transparency international)

The final score for each section (E, S and G) was calculated as an average score for all indicators included to the correspondent section. The final ESG-score was determined as a weighted average of all indicators included to all three sections having the equal weights in the model.